:: welcome to

NINOMANIA

:: A constitutional law blog by Scalia/Thomas fan David M. Wagner, M.A., J.D., Research Fellow, National Legal Foundation, and Teacher, Veritas Preparatory Academy. Opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not reflect those of the NLF or Veritas. :: bloghome | E-mail me ::


"Scalialicious!"
-- Eve Tushnet


"Frankfurter was born too soon for the Web, but I'm sure that, had it been possible, there would have been the equivalent of Ninomania for Frankfurter."
-- Mark Tushnet
(I agree, and commented here.)


"The preeminent Scalia blog"
-- Underneath Their Robes


 Subscribe in a reader



Site Feed


Also please visit my opera blog, Box Five!

    follow me on Twitter



    Bloglinks:

    Above the Law, by David Lat

    Balkinization

    CrimLaw

    Duncan's Con Law Course Blog

    Eve Tushnet

    Eye of Polyphemus, by Jamie Jeffords

    How Appealing

    Hugh Hewitt

    Justice Thomas Appreciation Page

    Legal Theory Blog

    Lex Communis

    Opinio Juris

    Overlawyered.com

    Paper Chase (from JURIST)

    Point of Law (Manhattan Inst.)

    Professor Bainbridge

    Public Discourse

    Redeeming Law, by Prof. Mike Schutt

    SCOTUS Blog

    Volokh Conspiracy

    WSJ Law Blog





    Other fine sites:

    Alexander Hamilton Inst. for Study of Western Civilization

    Ave Maria School of Law

    Center for Thomas More Studies

    Family Defense Center

    The Federalist Society

    The Founders' Constitution

    George Mason University School of Law

    Immigration and Refugee Appellate Center

    Judged: Law Firm News & Intelligence

    JURIST

    Law Prose (Bryan Garner)

    Liberty Library of Constitutional Classics

    National Lawyers Association (alternative to ABA)

    Supreme Court decisions

    The Weekly Standard



    Something I wrote about marriage


    lawyer blogs


    [::..archive..::]
    ::

    :: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 ::
    Due Process limits on punitive damages?

    I've just finished an on-line debate sponsored by the Manhattan Institute, "against," or I should say "with," my revered mentor and torts professor, Prof. Michael Krauss. You can read it here.

    The subject was the Supreme Court's use of Due Process to cap what Michael aptly calls "bet the company" punitive damage awards. The news hook was the Court's recent decision in Philip Morris v. Williams, a coalition-busting case in which Justice Breyer led the Court further into (what I would call) a neo-Lochnerian grove, and the lead dissenter was Justice Ginsburg -- joined in full by Justices Scalia and Thomas.

    In this debate I agreed with -- Justice Ginsburg! Ha ha! No, really, I did -- and with Our Hero too, natch. But (and this is what made the debate fruitful as well as interesting), I became convinced that the "excessive fines" clause of the Eighth Am. may -- may -- provide protection against what punitive damages have turned into in the last twenty years or so. Go, read.

    Many thanks not only to Michael but also to Walter Olson and Vanessa Mendoza.

    :: David M. Wagner 12:26 PM [+] ::
    ...

    Site Meter
    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?