:: welcome to

NINOMANIA

:: A constitutional law blog by Scalia/Thomas fan David M. Wagner, M.A., J.D., Research Fellow, National Legal Foundation, and Teacher, Veritas Preparatory Academy. Opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not reflect those of the NLF or Veritas. :: bloghome | E-mail me ::


"Scalialicious!"
-- Eve Tushnet


"Frankfurter was born too soon for the Web, but I'm sure that, had it been possible, there would have been the equivalent of Ninomania for Frankfurter."
-- Mark Tushnet
(I agree, and commented here.)


"The preeminent Scalia blog"
-- Underneath Their Robes


 Subscribe in a reader



Site Feed


Also please visit my opera blog, Box Five!

    follow me on Twitter



    Bloglinks:

    Above the Law, by David Lat

    Balkinization

    CrimLaw

    Duncan's Con Law Course Blog

    Eve Tushnet

    Eye of Polyphemus, by Jamie Jeffords

    How Appealing

    Hugh Hewitt

    Justice Thomas Appreciation Page

    Legal Theory Blog

    Lex Communis

    Opinio Juris

    Overlawyered.com

    Paper Chase (from JURIST)

    Point of Law (Manhattan Inst.)

    Professor Bainbridge

    Public Discourse

    Redeeming Law, by Prof. Mike Schutt

    SCOTUS Blog

    Volokh Conspiracy

    WSJ Law Blog





    Other fine sites:

    Alexander Hamilton Inst. for Study of Western Civilization

    Ave Maria School of Law

    Center for Thomas More Studies

    Family Defense Center

    The Federalist Society

    The Founders' Constitution

    George Mason University School of Law

    Immigration and Refugee Appellate Center

    Judged: Law Firm News & Intelligence

    JURIST

    Law Prose (Bryan Garner)

    Liberty Library of Constitutional Classics

    National Lawyers Association (alternative to ABA)

    Supreme Court decisions

    The Weekly Standard



    Something I wrote about marriage


    lawyer blogs


    [::..archive..::]
    ::

    :: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 ::
    Troxel too fuzzy? Try Fausey:

    The Family Research Council has submitted an amicus brief in support of cert in a parent's rights case, Fausey v. Hiller, in which the Court could clarify -- as it omitted to do in its last parent's rights case, Troxel v. Granville -- what the standard of review is when third parties seek visitation or other rights over children whose own parents have not been adjudicated unfit.

    This case puts FRC, as amicus, on the same side as the estimable Howard Bashman, who is representing the plaintiff.

    I note that in Howard's reply brief in support of cert, there is a section devoted precisely to the concerns voiced by Justice Scalia when he declined to join the majority in Troxel: "Providing States a Clear Legal Standard to Safeguard Troxel's Fundamental Right Will Not 'Constitutionalize' New Areas of Law Or 'Enmesh' the Court In Case-By-Case Adjudication."

    Bingo. Though, myself, I'd have done without the scarequotes around "constitutinalize" and "enmesh." But whatever. Good luck. Scalia's views are trenchant as always, but it is Justice Thomas's concurring view in Troxel (including his intriguing footnote) that the Court should adopt.

    :: David M. Wagner 10:48 PM [+] ::
    ...

    Site Meter
    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?