:: welcome to

NINOMANIA

:: A constitutional law blog by Scalia/Thomas fan David M. Wagner, M.A., J.D., Research Fellow, National Legal Foundation, and Teacher, Veritas Preparatory Academy. Opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not reflect those of the NLF or Veritas. :: bloghome | E-mail me ::


"Scalialicious!"
-- Eve Tushnet


"Frankfurter was born too soon for the Web, but I'm sure that, had it been possible, there would have been the equivalent of Ninomania for Frankfurter."
-- Mark Tushnet
(I agree, and commented here.)


"The preeminent Scalia blog"
-- Underneath Their Robes


 Subscribe in a reader



Site Feed


Also please visit my opera blog, Box Five!

    follow me on Twitter



    Bloglinks:

    Above the Law, by David Lat

    Balkinization

    CrimLaw

    Duncan's Con Law Course Blog

    Eve Tushnet

    Eye of Polyphemus, by Jamie Jeffords

    How Appealing

    Hugh Hewitt

    Justice Thomas Appreciation Page

    Legal Theory Blog

    Lex Communis

    Opinio Juris

    Overlawyered.com

    Paper Chase (from JURIST)

    Point of Law (Manhattan Inst.)

    Professor Bainbridge

    Public Discourse

    Redeeming Law, by Prof. Mike Schutt

    SCOTUS Blog

    Volokh Conspiracy

    WSJ Law Blog





    Other fine sites:

    Alexander Hamilton Inst. for Study of Western Civilization

    Ave Maria School of Law

    Center for Thomas More Studies

    Family Defense Center

    The Federalist Society

    The Founders' Constitution

    George Mason University School of Law

    Immigration and Refugee Appellate Center

    Judged: Law Firm News & Intelligence

    JURIST

    Law Prose (Bryan Garner)

    Liberty Library of Constitutional Classics

    National Lawyers Association (alternative to ABA)

    Supreme Court decisions

    The Weekly Standard



    Something I wrote about marriage


    lawyer blogs


    [::..archive..::]
    ::

    :: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 ::
    So let me jot this down, pending comparison with the official hearing transcript:
    Rep. Steve Cohen, D-TN: Is there a disproportionate number of Regent Law graduates at the Department of Justice?

    Monica Goodling: There are many more from Harvard and Yale.

    Rep. Cohen: That's very refreshing.
    Of course the correct expression is "Yale and Harvard," but I assume Miss G. will correct that in due course. The more important question is, what was Rep. Cohen thinking of? "Refreshing"?

    Obviously graduates of elite schools have the inside track, at DOJ as everywhere else -- but does Mr. Cohen mean that there is, or should be, some sort of rule to that effect? Like, an administration comes under suspicion of misconduct if its Yale-and-Harvard quotient at DOJ falls below some specified level?

    Or is the problem not under-representation of the big boys but over-representation of schools that don't have the advantage of centuries to boost their present standing?

    And Rep. Mike Pence, R-IN -- glad you liked your own Christian conservative school, but I would guess not everyone here would endorse the easy elision of those two terms. In that regard, I note the witness's interesting comparison of her year at American U. and her two years here.

    But look -- I can't believe the committee Democrats aren't getting competent political advice, and I can't believe competent political advice would tell Mr. Cohen to sound the elitist theme, or to make this about upstarts from Virginia Beach challenging their Ivy League betters. That may be red meat to some corners of the leftist blogosphere (those that are either elitist themselves, or are willing to turn elitist opportunistically), but I can't believe it plays well with the general voting public.

    :: David M. Wagner 1:05 PM [+] ::
    ...

    Site Meter
    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?