:: welcome to

NINOMANIA

:: A constitutional law blog by Scalia/Thomas fan David M. Wagner, M.A., J.D., Research Fellow, National Legal Foundation, and Teacher, Veritas Preparatory Academy. Opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not reflect those of the NLF or Veritas. :: bloghome | E-mail me ::


"Scalialicious!"
-- Eve Tushnet


"Frankfurter was born too soon for the Web, but I'm sure that, had it been possible, there would have been the equivalent of Ninomania for Frankfurter."
-- Mark Tushnet
(I agree, and commented here.)


"The preeminent Scalia blog"
-- Underneath Their Robes


 Subscribe in a reader



Site Feed


Also please visit my opera blog, Box Five!

    follow me on Twitter



    Bloglinks:

    Above the Law, by David Lat

    Balkinization

    CrimLaw

    Duncan's Con Law Course Blog

    Eve Tushnet

    Eye of Polyphemus, by Jamie Jeffords

    How Appealing

    Hugh Hewitt

    Justice Thomas Appreciation Page

    Legal Theory Blog

    Lex Communis

    Opinio Juris

    Overlawyered.com

    Paper Chase (from JURIST)

    Point of Law (Manhattan Inst.)

    Professor Bainbridge

    Public Discourse

    Redeeming Law, by Prof. Mike Schutt

    SCOTUS Blog

    Volokh Conspiracy

    WSJ Law Blog





    Other fine sites:

    Alexander Hamilton Inst. for Study of Western Civilization

    Ave Maria School of Law

    Center for Thomas More Studies

    Family Defense Center

    The Federalist Society

    The Founders' Constitution

    George Mason University School of Law

    Immigration and Refugee Appellate Center

    Judged: Law Firm News & Intelligence

    JURIST

    Law Prose (Bryan Garner)

    Liberty Library of Constitutional Classics

    National Lawyers Association (alternative to ABA)

    Supreme Court decisions

    The Weekly Standard



    Something I wrote about marriage


    lawyer blogs


    [::..archive..::]
    ::

    :: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 ::
    Prof. Kmiec: a parting of the ways

    Former students have been asking me about my continuing allegiance, vel non, to Prof. Douglas Kmiec's con law casebook (co-edited with Dean Eastman and Profs. Presser and Marcin), given -- Prof. Kmiec's sudden turn toward Obama advocacy, you were thinking? Shoot, man, con law casebook editors as a class think Daily Kos is a news site. No, I'm prepared not to care how the lead editor of an otherwise worthy book votes. What concerns me is his advocacy of the view that a Catholic may knowingly vote for a candidate who credibly promises to promote and extend the right to kill unborn children.

    It seems to me, and subject to correction (by the Church, I mean), that there's a difference between respectable error and apostasy, that Doug Kmiec has crossed it, and that a Catholic man's gotta do what a Catholic man's gotta do.

    First (always), the Church's position, because that is Christ's. It can be found, as regards the matter under discussion, in Evangelium Vitae (sections 72 and 101, I think, and possibly others). In addition, several U.S. bishops have recently spoken out, e.g. the bishops of Dallas and Fort Worth. (They cite a document from the USCCB called "Faithful Citizenship," but the USCCB as such has no teaching authority, so I prefer to cite individual bishops, whose teaching authority is -- guess what, 1Ls -- binding in their dioceses and persuasive elsewhere!)

    Next, Robert George, a scholar of jurisprudence at Princeton, who happens also to be a Catholic and an acknowledged expert in Natural Law theory, has written this, in reply to all who argue that Obama is a valid "pro-life" option in spite of being the most pro-abortion candidate ever to seek the presidency.

    Next, the wit and wisdom of Douglas Kmiec: try this, and of course this.

    So what's left? Oh, right -- me.

    Here's a lightly edited copy of a note I sent to our esteemed Faculty Secretary, Rena Campbell, just yesterday, embodying a request to be sent on to our campus bookstore:
    For Wagner Constitutional Law I, Spring 2009, the books will be:

    Randy Barnett, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CASES IN CONTEXT, Aspen Publishers, 2008, ISBN 978-0-7355-6344-5

    Edward Corwin, THE “HIGHER LAW” BACKGROUND OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Liberty Fund, ISBN 978-0-86597-695-5

    These replace AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER by Kmiec, Eastman, Presser & Marcin, which I will no longer be using.

    Some will be curious as to why I’m making this change. One reason is that the Barnett book has numerous virtues. But the single biggest reason is that Douglas Kmiec, principal editor of the other book, has been flaunting his formerly well-earned reputation as a pro-life Catholic in order to support Obama AND (much worse) to convince pro-life Catholics that they can licitly do so too. This is not just a wrong position but an apostate one, clearly irreconcilable with authoritative teaching documents of the Church, such as Evangelium Vitae.

    David
    EDITED TO ADD: Archbishop Chaput blasts Kmiec, other pro-Obama Catholics

    :: David M. Wagner 9:36 PM [+] ::
    ...

    Site Meter
    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?