:: welcome to

NINOMANIA

:: A constitutional law blog by Scalia/Thomas fan David M. Wagner, M.A., J.D., Research Fellow, National Legal Foundation, and Teacher, Veritas Preparatory Academy. Opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not reflect those of the NLF or Veritas. :: bloghome | E-mail me ::


"Scalialicious!"
-- Eve Tushnet


"Frankfurter was born too soon for the Web, but I'm sure that, had it been possible, there would have been the equivalent of Ninomania for Frankfurter."
-- Mark Tushnet
(I agree, and commented here.)


"The preeminent Scalia blog"
-- Underneath Their Robes


 Subscribe in a reader



Site Feed


Also please visit my opera blog, Box Five!

    follow me on Twitter



    Bloglinks:

    Above the Law, by David Lat

    Balkinization

    CrimLaw

    Duncan's Con Law Course Blog

    Eve Tushnet

    Eye of Polyphemus, by Jamie Jeffords

    How Appealing

    Hugh Hewitt

    Justice Thomas Appreciation Page

    Legal Theory Blog

    Lex Communis

    Opinio Juris

    Overlawyered.com

    Paper Chase (from JURIST)

    Point of Law (Manhattan Inst.)

    Professor Bainbridge

    Public Discourse

    Redeeming Law, by Prof. Mike Schutt

    SCOTUS Blog

    Volokh Conspiracy

    WSJ Law Blog





    Other fine sites:

    Alexander Hamilton Inst. for Study of Western Civilization

    Ave Maria School of Law

    Center for Thomas More Studies

    Family Defense Center

    The Federalist Society

    The Founders' Constitution

    George Mason University School of Law

    Immigration and Refugee Appellate Center

    Judged: Law Firm News & Intelligence

    JURIST

    Law Prose (Bryan Garner)

    Liberty Library of Constitutional Classics

    National Lawyers Association (alternative to ABA)

    Supreme Court decisions

    The Weekly Standard



    Something I wrote about marriage


    lawyer blogs


    [::..archive..::]
    ::

    :: Friday, March 05, 2010 ::
    A Yale Law Journal article makes the case for more, and more candid, political influence in administrative rule-making, linking this to the "democracy theory" of the Chevron doctrine, a theory I have always favored.

    (In a nutshell: Chevron doctrine = judicial deference to an agency's interpretation of a statute it administers, where that interpretation is at least reasonable and not foreclosed by the plain terms of the statute.)

    The people vote, a president is elected, he appoints agency heads (except for that embarrassing little anomoly called Humphrey's Executor that we'll get rid of some day, maybe even this term!), and boom -- agency policy shifts in the direction favored by the president the people elected. Duh. What's so hard about that? Why are so many scholars still so caught up in the late 19th century cult of expertise that they have a cow about this, instead of deferring to the "democratic" values that they claim to value in other contexts?

    Give it up, please, for Prof. Kathryn A. Watts, University of Washington School of Law! (The sentiments in the third graf here are mine, not necessarily hers, but I applaud her for leading the way.)

    :: David M. Wagner 1:41 PM [+] ::
    ...

    Site Meter
    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?