NINOMANIA
:: A constitutional law blog by Scalia/Thomas fan David M. Wagner, M.A., J.D., Research Fellow, National Legal Foundation, and Teacher, Veritas Preparatory Academy. Opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not reflect those of the NLF or Veritas. :: bloghome | E-mail me ::
:: Monday, June 28, 2010 ::
CLS is a loss. Ginsburg writes, as SCOTUSBlog predicted. Narrow, however: remand to 9th Circuit; CLS still has a case if Hastings applies its policy "selectively."
Remember that the oral argument in this case began with the Justices expressing confusion about the most basic facts in it, and proceeded with McConnell, arguing for CLS, fending off accusations of trying to back-peddle from some awfully lethal-sounding stipulations.
Alito writes the dissent, joined by Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas. Oi vey. Object lesson in picking cases with good facts, comma, importance of?
:: David M. Wagner 10:44 AM [+] ::
...
Remember that the oral argument in this case began with the Justices expressing confusion about the most basic facts in it, and proceeded with McConnell, arguing for CLS, fending off accusations of trying to back-peddle from some awfully lethal-sounding stipulations.
Alito writes the dissent, joined by Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas. Oi vey. Object lesson in picking cases with good facts, comma, importance of?
:: David M. Wagner 10:44 AM [+] ::
...
