:: welcome to

NINOMANIA

:: A constitutional law blog by Scalia/Thomas fan David M. Wagner, M.A., J.D., Research Fellow, National Legal Foundation, and Teacher, Veritas Preparatory Academy. Opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not reflect those of the NLF or Veritas. :: bloghome | E-mail me ::


"Scalialicious!"
-- Eve Tushnet


"Frankfurter was born too soon for the Web, but I'm sure that, had it been possible, there would have been the equivalent of Ninomania for Frankfurter."
-- Mark Tushnet
(I agree, and commented here.)


"The preeminent Scalia blog"
-- Underneath Their Robes


 Subscribe in a reader



Site Feed


Also please visit my opera blog, Box Five!

    follow me on Twitter



    Bloglinks:

    Above the Law, by David Lat

    Balkinization

    CrimLaw

    Duncan's Con Law Course Blog

    Eve Tushnet

    Eye of Polyphemus, by Jamie Jeffords

    How Appealing

    Hugh Hewitt

    Justice Thomas Appreciation Page

    Legal Theory Blog

    Lex Communis

    Opinio Juris

    Overlawyered.com

    Paper Chase (from JURIST)

    Point of Law (Manhattan Inst.)

    Professor Bainbridge

    Public Discourse

    Redeeming Law, by Prof. Mike Schutt

    SCOTUS Blog

    Volokh Conspiracy

    WSJ Law Blog





    Other fine sites:

    Alexander Hamilton Inst. for Study of Western Civilization

    Ave Maria School of Law

    Center for Thomas More Studies

    Family Defense Center

    The Federalist Society

    The Founders' Constitution

    George Mason University School of Law

    Immigration and Refugee Appellate Center

    Judged: Law Firm News & Intelligence

    JURIST

    Law Prose (Bryan Garner)

    Liberty Library of Constitutional Classics

    National Lawyers Association (alternative to ABA)

    Supreme Court decisions

    The Weekly Standard



    Something I wrote about marriage


    lawyer blogs


    [::..archive..::]
    ::

    :: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 ::
    "Critique the right to marry as a movement priority"

    AALS conventions are one of the places where the "cutting edge" cuts its edges. It is with a certain amount of surprise, then, that one finds on the menu of one of the inevitable rethink-the-family seminars that they have every year at their early-January general conventions, the following offering from next January's meeting:
    The law and advocates engaged in disputes over marriage and family make varying assumptions about facts of social life and the appropriate aims of legal regulation. This plenary panel questions these assumptions and asks who is actually benefited by the positions social movements and advocacy organizations take. The panelists will explore issues such as feminist and critical race critiques of marriage and the right to marry as a movement priority; the failure of lesbigay legal reform programs adequately to protect transgender youth and their precarious location vis-à-vis family; and whether it is proper for the state to seek to “establish” and confer favor upon any one particular family formation. [Emphasis added]
    Many translations are possible; I suggest two, but there are others: (a) We've never liked marriage, and we're sick of pretending; (b) We're losing on marriage, so why not link up with those crazy libertarians and destabilize it through the "get the state out of it" route?

    :: David M. Wagner 1:45 PM [+] ::
    ...

    Site Meter
    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?