NINOMANIA
:: A constitutional law blog by Scalia/Thomas fan David M. Wagner, M.A., J.D., Research Fellow, National Legal Foundation, and Teacher, Veritas Preparatory Academy. Opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not reflect those of the NLF or Veritas. :: bloghome | E-mail me ::
:: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 ::
Here is a better link for Prof. Randy Barnett's WSJ op-ed on McDonald. H/t: Randy! And leave it to CATO to make sure its scholars' op-eds are available to the public! ;)
The reason you should read this is that it details why the Thomas concurrence not only provides a scholarly analysis of the 14th Am. Privileges or Immunities Clause issue, but also why it makes that clause no longer ignorable.
:: David M. Wagner 4:29 PM [+] ::
...
The reason you should read this is that it details why the Thomas concurrence not only provides a scholarly analysis of the 14th Am. Privileges or Immunities Clause issue, but also why it makes that clause no longer ignorable.
:: David M. Wagner 4:29 PM [+] ::
...
